Sorry, I didn't mean to denigrate you or anybody else on the forum. I guess I just felt like we were jumping the gun a little bit is all; I can't imagine
the Mallers attacking
Fort Irwin. While
Scratch did want to find out where
Pegs and co. are, she doesn't know that they're in Boulder and that
Michael is in this fortified compound.
Actually honestly I have found Scratch's tenacity probably the biggest flaw in the plot of We're Alive. The Mallers attacked
the Tower in the first instance because they wanted to take over it - essentially they wanted to do to the Tower what they did to
the Colony; subordinate all the original population and control it themselves. But then they destroyed the lobby with a pipe bomb? Was that because it all just descended into warfare? In the second instance Scratch attacked purely to get Pegs. I can kind of understand this, as if you looked up the word "bitch" in the dictionary you'd find "See 'Scratch'", but I just think that this notion of revenge is a little too weak to build this story around. The Tower people have only ever defended themselves, so you can understand their antagonism towards them, but I think sometimes the explanation for the Mallers' aggressiveness is a bit lacking.
This goes hand in hand with how the zombies turned away in Episode 13 just because they successfully put out the fire...why did Pin Stripes reverse the horde? Whatever.
Bookmarks