Quote Originally Posted by LiamKerrington View Post
I admit it: I am not very certain about the results. But I have seen several examples in which two words were provided, which actually could be connected to one word either. So I raise the question here: Is it valid to split a one word into two parts in order to go on with the game? Then happenstance would be a valid option; if not, I am sorry for failing - yet again ...

All the best!
Liam
i would think yes, so long as the two words are actual words. for instance, if the word was actual, actual ize would not be valid, but actual eyes would i'm just kidding about actual eyes, but hey, that could be another concept we could explore for the game, breaking down the word into two words that when said together form the word.

for instance: to actualize
the next word would be: actual eyes
the next word would be: eyes open

so you could play it straight, or where you can, you could break words, as above.