The Never-ending Link Game v 1.0

[reaper239]

Alignment justify

this isn't part of the game but, Justified. just Justified

[turbo]

Wrong way to spell, whoops.

[LiamKerrington]

[justifi]ed + it = edit

[Robzombie]

happen + stance = happenstance

Thank you, YABC; I didn't think of this path to go.

I was going to do this one but didn't think it qualified. To me it should be 2 seperate words otherwise no dice man. Nor should changing the tense, or from singular to plural, (or any of those other fancy grammatical words) etc,...Should be the word as previously given, no changes, so that's how I've been playing anyways.

[LiamKerrington]

I was going to do this one but didn't think it qualified. To me it should be 2 seperate words otherwise no dice man. Nor should changing the tense, or from singular to plural, (or any of those other fancy grammatical words) etc,...Should be the word as previously given, no changes, so that's how I've been playing anyways.

I admit it: I am not very certain about the results. But I have seen several examples in which two words were provided, which actually could be connected to one word either. So I raise the question here: Is it valid to split a one word into two parts in order to go on with the game? Then happenstance would be a valid option; if not, I am sorry for failing - yet again ...

All the best!
Liam

[reaper239]

I admit it: I am not very certain about the results. But I have seen several examples in which two words were provided, which actually could be connected to one word either. So I raise the question here: Is it valid to split a one word into two parts in order to go on with the game? Then happenstance would be a valid option; if not, I am sorry for failing - yet again ...

All the best!
Liam

i would think yes, so long as the two words are actual words. for instance, if the word was actual, actual ize would not be valid, but actual eyes would i'm just kidding about actual eyes, but hey, that could be another concept we could explore for the game, breaking down the word into two words that when said together form the word.

for instance: to actualize
the next word would be: actual eyes
the next word would be: eyes open

so you could play it straight, or where you can, you could break words, as above.

[Litmaster]

i would think yes, so long as the two words are actual words. for instance, if the word was actual, actual ize would not be valid, but actual eyes would i'm just kidding about actual eyes, but hey, that could be another concept we could explore for the game, breaking down the word into two words that when said together form the word.

for instance: to actualize
the next word would be: actual eyes
the next word would be: eyes open

so you could play it straight, or where you can, you could break words, as above.

Screw it, man... I say if you're clever enough to make it work in some entertaining fashion, we should let it ride. WTF are we, the Olympic Committee? Let's just use this rule of thumb: if you can float it without Osiris going ballistic, then you're GOOD.

With that having been said...

Alignment justify

justify margins!

[turbo]

margins tax

[Wicked Sid]

Tax Break.

[turbo]

Break dance