Quote Originally Posted by Osiris View Post
You're putting a lot of emphasis on what isn't on the tape, while being entirely dismissive of what is.
Something tells me that this is true for you, too. As you say: we keep circling.
As it turns out you speak in favor of Scratch without considering all the things she could have swallowed instead of going full throttle and heads on into more and more complications. Instead of taking my "arguments" or "opinions", you simply address me by telling me how stupid I am, because I argue based on "intents" or assumptions or whatever. Everything I tell you is based on face value from the WA show and the conclusions I draw out of them; and I put a lot of effort explaining things. And as soon as I get more and more details from the show which in my opinion support my way of thinking, you simply tell me how wrong I am without offering any kind of proof how Scratch would be different from what I say. Instead you simply ignore all the incriminating information that sheds a bad light on Scratch and tell me how wrong I am - and this is especially true when you simplify the war-situation and simply neglect all the influence Scratch has performed to get it rolling.
Sorry - I am tired of this game. I think I made my point. If it comes to Scratch we remain the same ever since we started discussing about it a year ago. And this will remain forever, I guess. So I back done. But that does not mean I give in.

Anyway: Thank you - this argument was rich and something I have missed for quite some time on this forum.

Best wishes!
Liam