I call that extremely violent, but neither insane or psychopathic. However, not every violent criminal has a mental/psychological disorder. This isn't intended to be rude or condescending, but please remember that she is part of
the Family, more or less spelled out that she is in the American Cosa Nostra (or Mafia if you will). They have their own way of living and their own rules, everyone else be darned. Although their main purpose is to earn money, the Mafia has quite the reputation for its violence and murder. Heck, what she did was no worse than putting a favored horse's head in the enemy's bed or any of the things seen on the Soprano. You might say that those are sensationalized, but it is all based on true events and not a stranger to real life occurrences. Each Family has its own set of rules, so I can't say what
Scratch's Family follows. Was
Hannah's death tragic? Yes. However, Hannah was only a means to an end for
the Mallers. La Casa Nostra translates to "this thing of ours". She wasn't part of the Family. Also, do we know for certain that Scratch thought
Kalani was dead after the first Tower attack failure? I'll have to go back and re-listen. Because if she had even the smallest inkling that Kalani had switched teams, then the death of Hannah could have been for vengeance. Kalani could have spilled his guts about what he knew about the Mallers (which is breaking the Code of Silence, a punishment worthy of vengeance and death in the eyes of the Family) Anyways, she was dead either way the instance she got in Scratch's and
Latch's car with Kalani. Interesting how all 3 of the survivors (Kalani, Hannah, and
Pippin) are now dead. It's because the Mallers (and essentially The Family) could care less about them. They are all means to an end. And the only reason (that we know so far) that Lizzie is being protected the way she is and not being tortured or even left for dead is because of Scratch's past. She could have easily have let
Tardust or any other Maller have at it, but she didn't. Scratch seems to not take notice of the social structure though. We don't have much information to go off of with the Mallers, but from what we know, it seems
Durai is the Boss (or Don), and Scratch (since breaking the Mallers out) has taken place as the Under Boss (2nd in Command) and also the Capo (the Lieutenant over the "soldiers"/those who do the dirty work). But Scratch isn't afraid of getting her hands dirty.
Also, I seem to remember quite a few examples of heroes torturing and/or killing needlessly, and instead of being labelled evil and insane, they instead get labelled a BAMF instead. The most popular of examples is Jack Bauer from 24. He has as much blood on his hands as all the villains he went against. However, since he saved the day, he is lauded as a hero and totally awesome. Liam Neesan in the movie Taken. I remember a rather brutal torture scene and then leaving the guy for dead. The folks over in Law & Order:SVU had several moments. Heck, even Buffy from Buffy the Vampire Slayer has tortured needlessly. But since they're the villains, the demons, we the viewer aren't supposed to care. We're supposed to cheer instead. Seems like a bit of a double standard to me....
But it seems that you have your mind made up, and you don't want to even step an iota from your decision/belief. And I understand and respect that. However, I just wanted to answer your question that you posed to me. I
hope you took no offense from what I said. This is just how I see it and what I've come up with after listening and researching. Thanks Kc! I've put in some great research on some very interesting subjects since listening to the last few Chapters. A sign of a great story!
Bookmarks