Quote Originally Posted by nikvoodoo View Post
I remember a few months ago watching a TED talk from Jack Horner who is America's foremost palentologist. He stepped through a number of species of dinosaur we've assumed were different until he asked the logical question: How come we don't see the children and adolescent versions of these creatures?

The reason being is in some instances like Triceratops and Torosaurs are actually the same animals...just younger. But because Triceratops were discovered first, it was considered it's own creature and this small "puny" Torosaur couldn't possibly be the same thing. But he has taken strides to prove it's the same thing.

I feel like it's the same idea. Just because we hadn't seen the Little Ones first, doesn't mean we have a new species of zombie. Roman is pretty much the missing link to me. If he turned into what was described as a little one (#12 dead in the field) and to me he sounded different than he did the night before, I'd say it's almost a slam dunk that the little ones are adolescent Behemoths.
well, see i don't think so because look at this: it's been six months since we first saw a little one with a number on it, and after all this time they have only managed to get taller, not bulkier, and not giant sized either. and we first saw the behemoths within the first couple of weeks. plus we've never had a report of a behemoth with a number on it, and i think that would be kind of important, "big ass zombie, big ass number on its wrist, hey, i think that might be important."