User Tag List

Page 15 of 18 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 175
  1. #141
    HorrorHiro's Avatar
    "Hoarder"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Freedom's base of operati
    Posts
    241
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassWell LikedVeteran10000 Experience Points

    PSN ID: HorrorHiro
    Wait...why does bombing L.A. even matter? Hasn't it been confirmed that this has happened all over the world? What would nuking L.A. solve?

  2. #142
    Cabbage Patch's Avatar
    "Body Removal Team"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    967
    Achievements:
    Bug Hunter First ClassPro Level Wiki EditorWA PointsTagger First Class25000 Experience PointsLOVED TO DEATHVeteran
    Using nukes against the Mallers/Colony is a desperation move, there are much easier methods for raining violence upon them if needed. And if the entire country is over-run, what's the point in nuking zombie concentrations in LA?

    On the other hand, if Ground Zero is the sole source of the global outbreak, or if LA is the unique home of the non-standard zombies and you can identify the "factory", then you might have a target worthy of nuclear escalation.

  3. #143
    HorrorHiro's Avatar
    "Hoarder"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Freedom's base of operati
    Posts
    241
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassWell LikedVeteran10000 Experience Points

    PSN ID: HorrorHiro
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabbage Patch View Post
    Using nukes against the Mallers/Colony is a desperation move, there are much easier methods for raining violence upon them if needed. And if the entire country is over-run, what's the point in nuking zombie concentrations in LA?

    On the other hand, if Ground Zero is the sole source of the global outbreak, or if LA is the unique home of the non-standard zombies and you can identify the "factory", then you might have a target worthy of nuclear escalation.
    Neither the zombies (regular or irregular) nor the Mallers/Colony are a good enough reason for nuking that part of the country. And ground zero can't be where it started because Kimmet said that it started in the East.

    Vast majority of human race is either dead or apart of the creatures/zombies/whatever the fuck you want to call them. Even if every concentration of them was nuked off the face of the earth they would still greatly outnumber the living.

  4. #144
    UndeadSweeper's Avatar
    "Stalker"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    822
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience PointsExtreme Love
    Why is nuke the only option? Could they napalm or non-radioactive options?

  5. #145
    7oddisdead's Avatar
    omnipresent

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,758
    Blog Entries
    4
    Achievements:
    BloggerBug Hunter First ClassExtreme LoveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Blog Entries
    4

    Gamertag: t0dd i5 d3ad PSN ID: --- Steam ID: --- Wii Code: ---
    Quote Originally Posted by UndeadSweeper View Post
    Why is nuke the only option? Could they napalm or non-radioactive options?
    that's what I'm saying...i think hinting at nukes was done to accomplish one thing....scare. Mission success
    KAW

    W/A convoy supply and general manager: info? follow ? > @_toddisdead

  6. #146
    Loyal Retainer's Avatar
    "Scavenger"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Shirt View Post
    Anything in particular you are trying to recall? There's Fuel Air Thermobaric, GBU43/B MOAB, GBU-57A/B MOP and of course everyone's favorite, Napalm.


    Walking Dead Spoiler:
    SPOILER 



    Not necessarily... With Ground Zero II, pick a target, pick a yield and bombs away. The B53 "Crowd Pleaser" the largest in the US stockpile had a nominal yield of 9Mt and would still have been in the arsenal in 2009. (The last was decommissioned in 2011, at Pantex, of course.) You could "sterilize" 90% of LA with three by targeting Anaheim, Lynwood and West Hollywood. I checked the fallout paths, assuming that the wind would drive it inland and Irwin would be in the clear.

    Sorry if I'm hitting too close to home there for you LA.
    Good. So I wasn't the only nerd that looked up blast maps and fallout patterns to see if a nuke would send fallout the 160 miles to Ft. Irwin? The only bomb I could find that would send fallout to the fort was the Czar Bomba (50 MT) which isn't available to anyone. My problem with nuking L.A. Is yes you may get rid of the infected but you're also destroying tons of valuable resources and any survivors left in the city. When you start deploying nukes that's an end game move when you have no hope left, which I don't think they've reached yet.

  7. #147
    Witch_Doctor's Avatar
    Mofo with the Mojo

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Mysterical Island, Va.
    Posts
    2,070
    Achievements:
    WA PointsExtreme Love50000 Experience PointsVeteranPro Level Wiki Editor

    Quote Originally Posted by HorrorHiro View Post
    Neither the zombies (regular or irregular) nor the Mallers/Colony are a good enough reason for nuking that part of the country. And ground zero can't be where it started because Kimmet said that it started in the East.
    Vast majority of human race is either dead or apart of the creatures/zombies/whatever the fuck you want to call them. Even if every concentration of them was nuked off the face of the earth they would still greatly outnumber the living.
    Are you sure? Where does Kimmet say that? I heard Kimmet say that he believes it started in hotspots on the west coast, L.A., San Fran., Oregon. The whole country was over-run a day and a half latter. They lost contact with the eastcoast about a week after the west was hit.
    Call Sign: Jive Turkey
    Ladies and Gentlemen, straight from Mysterical Island, it's the Shaman of Schiznick, the Mofo with the Mojo, the Mad Scientist of the Jungle, the Doctor is in!
    Doctor? Doctor who?
    NO! Witch Doctor, fool!

  8. #148
    Privateer's Avatar
    "Scavenger"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    98
    Theres no reason to nuke LA that overcome the vast reasons /not/ to nuke LA. Reason for: Yeah, its not the only concentration of zombies, but it is, by far, the closest and most dangerous to what may be the only operating military facility in the continental U.S. Reason against: Its the closest to the only operating military facility in the continental U.S. There's Morale to think of, because it is a last resort option, and any time you send a soldier south he's gonna have to have a radiation suit. You make an absurd amount of resources unavailable. Not just oil reserves, but factories, infrastructure, scrap metal, etc. And, its unnecessary. What is the zombie population... Really? Victor and Saul have driven through vast swathes of L.A. Without having to deal with any, and how big is the occasional horde? Beyond that, hordes show very little threat to Irwin. With awesome visibility, scouts, and radios, they'd see any concentration heading towards them a long ways off. And they can evacuate.

  9. #149
    IamPaul's Avatar
    "Gatherer"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Capital City of Kansas
    Posts
    194
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsWell LikedVeteran
    Also thinking, any massive bombing in the area could shift tectonic plates or open more cracks along the LA side of the Ring of Fire. Not that that matters since the population is basically gone now anyways. I praise all the people that take the time to research everything for this show. It is what makes the show and the fans so great.

  10. #150
    Red Shirt's Avatar
    "Hoarder"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Nashua, NH
    Posts
    375
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsLOVED TO DEATHVeteran

    Gamertag: AnotherRedShirt Steam ID: AnotherRedShirt
    I just realized I play the devil's advocate so hard that I should have a varsity letter for it.

    Should LA be nuked? Absolutely not. As I and many others have said, there are too many resources to be had. Most notably the active oil wells and the refineries that are in LA. Those are going to be extremely important going forward IMO.

    But what if that decision has been made and those scouting teams aren't looking for targets and reasons to, but in fact, are scouting for reasons NOT to?


    Put in that situation, I'm only a Staff Sergeant he's a Colonel... I'd follow orders. "Hey Sergeant, you seem to have a bizarrely eclectic knowledge set of esoteric minutiae. I need to, ahem, sterilize LA. Can you figure it out for me?" "Sure sir. It's a very bad idea, but with B53's here, here and here, you can get it done quite handily. Now,if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go find a quiet corner to hide in."
    "I've got tons of great ideas. Trouble is, most of 'em suck." George Carlin
    "I've got the guns, the radio and the water for the Zombie Apocalypse, but you gotta have a yo-yo." Chris Boden

    Hey, get a load of this. Guess who started writing again and has a spot in the fan fiction subforum?


 
Page 15 of 18 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •