Who's The Rat v2.0

[Ra1th]

I think either you are misunderstanding or I have misrepresented my point in regards to people recognising him, Firstly, I think multiple people claiming to recognise him is suspicious, Secondly, I think the fact that he denies it when it happens also points to either him genuinely not remembering him or him trying to hide something that the other aren't aware of. .

And I’m telling you for the Datu case, it was almost surely the first case. Genuinely not remembering who the maintenance guy of his girlfriend’s apartment building was. He might be hiding something with scratch though. But that’s one situation not two.

Yeah, I don't think Angel is happy with the way things are going in the tower, In my opinion, he wouldn't have made a (pathetic)play for power in Chapter20(Much like Steven did when Burt was in charge?), .

It was not a play for power at all. How is “It would have been nice to have been considered for leadership” taken as bitter disgruntlement with the way things are run. What has Michael or Burt done, that Angel has taken serious issue with? I’m not seeing what Angel should be so angry about, that he’d want to overthrow Michael and Burt. And if that WAS his intention, then he wouldn’t just let it be known that he’d like to be considered for leadership. IMO it was just a passing remark, maybe even as a fan shout out to the “ Angel for leader “ wars that was going on at the time. Im still not seeing the motive Angel has for wanting a change of power.

And while my previous posts seem to show that the mystery surrounding Angel and Scratch is the only reason I believe him to be the traitor, that's not the case, but I do think Angel's actions around her show that he is trying to hide something, shooting a survivor(regardless of background) isn't something to be proud of. .

And like I’ve said, He could be hiding something with scratch. But that alone is not reason to call him the traitor, maybe that is a little suspicious, but to guarantee that he is absolutely and most definitely under all circumstances the traitor, is far fetched. The other reasons you’re giving me, either I’m not understanding them properly or they don’t hold water.