A dictator could take control because of everybody having a gun. Him and his supporters just have to murder the leaders and BAM! Chaos. Who unites
the colony? The dictator.
Pre determined battle stations is great but if you already have people manning the perimeter eg the guardians you have greater warning + a well trained force to repel at least the first few waves.
By that time the citizens are armed with more substantial fire arms than the handguns I suggested were allowed for defence of ones person.
As usual you see the best in people Reaper, which is by no means a fault. But especially when your survival is on the line people tend to be paranoid, territorial etc.
What happens the first time a community who is hard pushed for food strays into a neighbouring communities foraging grounds and gets caught?
Within the communities bonds would be strong as seen in
the tower but I'm talking inter-community disputes and conflicts.
As far as Europe's shootings go I can't think of a Major one in Britain since Raoul Moat. And that was three people killed. Just as a comparison in America there were 8775 murders using firearms (2011). The total for the UK in 2006? 49. When you even out our populations (Britain is about a sixth of your population) Britain is 294 killings to your 8775. Other European countries cannot be lumped together as each one has slightly different firearms policies. Anyway, this is not a firearms thread although if you want to start that discussion hit me up! I can't comment as to the people of texas as I haven't ever been there.
Bookmarks