Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Grammar Grammar:  0
WAPoints WAPoints:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 276

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    reaper239's Avatar
    "Expelled From The Tower"

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    aberdeen
    Posts
    1,628
    Blog Entries
    22
    Blog Entries
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by HaveCrowBarWillTravel View Post
    I dig how every time a Dem is running or elected the "They're gonna take your guns" stuff starts up. Ain't happened yet and isn't going to happen. My rights as a black man voting will go before that ever happens. Congress passes laws, the president doesn't. Anyway..
    I'll buy as many weapons as I need to protect my family (which will be a Saiga12, AR15 and a .380 for the wife.. and that's it).

    Yarri,
    how come you haven't purchased a weapon yet? Bersa makes some pretty inexpensive .380's. The Beretta Nano will run you about 450. Just make up your mind that you're gonna do it and set aside the money each check. I know how hard it is to get going, but you need to have some form of a firearm.
    That knucklehead walking down Hollywood blvd a couple months ago made up my mind to get serious about buying one. Random crap like that is what we're dealing with these days instead of gov trying to take away our .50 cal duck hunting guns.
    what incident was this?

    i disagree on one point: the fed is trying to disarm the people, but it's not dems or reps, it's "progressives" which can be found in both parties. the problem is not one huge sweeping gun ban, it's little things. peice by peice they chip away at our freedoms until they can remove them wholesale from the constitution. like the assault weapons ban. anything can be used to assault someone, and therefore that would make it an assault weapon right? so the title is ambiguous, so let's go to content: it banned semi-automatic rifles. not assault rifles, which is a clissification of rifle defined by the inclusion of a select fire feature, but semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15, and it banned things based on aesthetics, not function. thank goodness that silly piece of legislation was not renewed, but that's how it starts. look at britain, they didn't start with the wholesale ban of firearms, they started with little restrictions here and there until not even the police are allowed to carry guns. sorry for the rant, i just see the threat to our freedoms as very real.
    Last edited by reaper239; May 9th, 2012 at 04:33 AM.


 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •