He was. To some degree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Osiris
Duffus: About your PEG 13 work ... You did quite a job there.
Printable View
He was. To some degree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Osiris
Duffus: About your PEG 13 work ... You did quite a job there.
To all degrees.Quote:
Originally Posted by LiamKerrington
Let me put it this way: I was not half as sorry for him having deceased as I was for many others on the show ... But: I agree with the character of edit: Burt (fixed it, thx Duffus), who stressed the simple fact that Bill at least fought together with the tower-folks. Does this make him a good guy? Or any better? Especially considering all the theft he did on the one side and the trouble he offered for the towerites on the other? Simple: No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Osiris
Overall Bill cussed in almost every line. Burt would often talk for a few minutes between cussing.
I did duplicate chapter 6, Thanks for catching that for me Zi will fix it tonight :)
PS It was Burt that pointed out that Bill fought with them in the end
PPS Thanks for the Kudos I NEED something to be obsessive compulsive about and right now that's We're Alive
PPPS. What is PEG 13 work? Sound like something dirty that Michael likes ;)
Not trying to be a dick, but is this legal or does it at least have the blessing of KC? Personally, I'd be pretty upset if someone took my Podcasts, edited all the naughty words out, then re-posted them without my blessing.
Thx, fixed it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffusmonkey
I support this. Just re-editting for changing the PEG-rating won't be considered as 'fair use', thuis copyright-rules fully apply.Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadMen_Walking
In favor of Duffusmonkey speak certain things, though: a) Duffusmonkey shares something, which is available for free anyway; b) Duffusmonkey does not claim ownership, infact all the official credits are still part of each episode; c) Kc observes this forum quite thoroughly (my understanding), which leads me to the assumption that he acquiesces to it (not sure though; I wouldn't want to speak for him).
All the best!
Liam
I'm not saying anything was stolen and for all I know, KC was aware that he did this and is perfectly fine with it. I was just asking the question. If a fan of my Podcasts (which are also free) edited content and then reposted them, I would at least like to be asked first.Quote:
Originally Posted by LiamKerrington
Matt
Deadmen_Walking: Sorry, no offense intended. Again: I agree with you.
LiamKerrington: No offense taken, my good man. And now I do see where Duffusmonkey asked KC in another thread if this was ok. For all I know KC saw this and responded to him with a personal message on here. So my question/concern is probably all for not. lol
All I'm going to say is this:
I do not agree with manipulating art to be less offensive to an individual. It's like walking into a gallery, taking a paintbrush, and slopping black all over a painting because it shows the form of a naked woman and you don't want to expose you child to it. Here's a pro-tip, don't expose your kids to it period. If you think it's too much for their little minds to comprehend, don't expose them to it. Don't take it upon yourself to force that value upon the world around you.
I don't agree with what is taking place here. Art is art. Leave art the fuck alone.